Literary update

It’s 2019, so let’s have another progress update! I’m sad to admit that I don’t have much to show for most of 2018 because of home improvement projects and other real-life odds and ends that needed my attention, but throughout it all I kept reading.

Most of that reading had to do with Shakespeare, so when my friend Hrefna decided to organize a session of SCAiri talks (TED-like talks on SCA subjects) at a recent event, I jumped on that bandwagon as a potentially better venue for teaching Shakespeare than an hour-long class. Long story short, I gave two presentations — one on All’s Well That Ends Well and another on Pericles, Prince of Tyre.

In retrospect — I think the format worked really well. The biggest struggle for me was fitting everything into the required 15-minute time frame after I added at least one slide for each scene. With practice I was able to get it all into one high-energy, fast-talking presentation each. The lesson learned, however, is that in the future I should stick to a broader summary so I have more time to focus on major plot points and issues that deserve more attention. And, as Hrefna kindly noted, I could improve my future presentations by spending more time looking at the audience than at my slides. 😉 (Thanks, Hrefna!) Some of that would be fixed by focusing on broader issues, since the time crunch meant that I was trying to speed through my slides, which necessitated more eye focus on them than they would have if I could have spent more time on each slide.

Before the SCAiri talks came up, I had been working my way through Timon of Athens. This is another play which I might turn into a class or presentation someday. I can see some elements that might still resonate today, particularly the focus on material generosity as an attempt to buy love and how it’s exploited by greed. My progress in reading the play has been a bit of a slog, however, and one that was put on hold while I worked on these presentations and took a holiday break into Jane Austen and some of her fanfiction.

While I should just finish that (I’m seriously into Act IV or V by now, I think), I might get distracted yet again for another project that will take me into Orlando Furioso. I haven’t read it at all yet, though I’ve been asked by another friend about participating in a project related to it, so…time to get reading! From what little digging I’ve done so far, it sounds like an epic Renaissance soap opera, so I’m looking forward to it. More on that later!

Advertisements
Posted in Literature, Progress | Leave a comment

Class Handout on All’s Well That Ends Well

I’ve started a new thing: I want to teach classes on some of Shakespeare’s plays that are less familiar to contemporary audiences. I’ve started with All’s Well That Ends Well — one of his problematic comedies that has some relevance in the wake of the #MeToo movement, and yet some possibly redeeming qualities.

I’ll be teaching the class tomorrow at the Performing Arts Symposium in our local group. Attendees will get an abridged, three-page version of the handout that excludes a scene-by-scene summary to keep the printing costs down. The full seven-page handout is online here for anyone interested.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why you need to see the Illinois Shakespeare Festival’s Cymbeline

A couple years ago, I read Cymbeline and wrote a blog post about it here. A couple weeks ago, I finally had an opportunity to see it performed live at the Illinois Shakespeare Festival. They also have a very good production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream this year, which I highly recommend. But, if it’s at all possible to go and you can only see one of the two, I strongly recommend seeing Cymbeline.

First, this is a play that is rarely produced, so it’s not an opportunity that arrives very often. As I wrote in my blog post, there are some mixed-genre issues that make it less popular, as well as some character behaviors that have not aged well — case in point, the Elizabethan obsession with wives cheating on their husbands, Posthumous’ order to have his wife Imogen murdered after he’s tricked into believing she cheated on him, and her forgiveness of him at the end of the play…

…Which is all the more reason why this particular production shines so well in 2017. Set as a turn-of-the-20th-century vaudeville company, Illinois Shakespeare plays up the “mellerdrammer” quality of the play’s more soap-opera-like elements with a “pianist” character. The pianist is obviously not canon, but proves to be a wise choice for a couple of reasons. He immediately makes himself useful at the beginning in helping to “translate” a soliloquy full of exposition (delivered by a psychic circus performer in a turban) to ensure that the audience understands, and continues to interject responses to actions throughout the play. While unconventional in a Shakespeare production, this is especially helpful when the original language is especially obtuse to modern ears.

The pianist’s greater value, however, is in helping the audience interpret the play beyond textual notes. Characters’ reactions that might seem odd to the audience are followed by comments such as (and I paraphrase here), “When you’re lonely and missing your significant other, it’s easy to make rash choices that you probably wouldn’t make otherwise.” At the end of the play, the pianist draws a comparison between the characters of Cymbeline and his family with King Lear and his family — suggesting that the happy ending at the end of Cymbeline is what Lear might have wished for, and the importance of forgiveness.

This proved to be the sweetest possible ending to what is largely considered a “problem” play, and the overall experience was very enjoyable. Beyond the modern adaptation, the cast and crew did a phenomenal job of bringing the characters and actions to life, even with six total actors — some of whom played three or four different parts. This led to some additional humor in scenes such as Posthumous fighting Cloten, as one actor played both parts and moved back and forth to either side of a screen in a costume that was split down the middle to show what the two characters had been wearing in previous scenes. The queen is a man in drag as a bearded lady. It’s just a lot of fun.

 

Posted in Literature | Leave a comment

Writing on birchbark

From the 11th to 14th centuries, the people of Novgorod had an unusually literate culture for its time. Men, women, peasants, and even children knew how to read and write, and they used slips of birchbark for business and personal correspondence.

Messages on birchbark were typically short, written on the inner, smoother side of bark strips – 5-15 inches by 1-5 inches on average. They usually name the writer, then the recipient, followed by a statement and a clear ending. Many writers began with a cross as a way of blessing. There was no punctuation or capitalization.

The birchbark was prepared for use by being boiled in water to make it pliable (Lobatcheva et al). However, in my experiments in rendering birchbark that I had purchased online, hot, non-boiling water curled up the bark like cinnamon.

Boiling, or even cuir bouilling birchbark: I can’t recommend it.

More experiments will be needed to determine how to reproduce “boiled” bark as it might have been rendered in period.

What DID work was simply soaking the bark for at least a few hours, with better results from soaking overnight. The pieces I ordered online were pretty thick, so soaking enabled me to peel them apart into thinner strips — thus giving me more pieces to work with.

Soaking birchbark. The screwdriver is used as a weight, since the pieces want to float. This method wasn’t terribly effective, and after taking this photo I switched to some blocks of soapstone I had lying around.

The thinner the strip, the more flexible it is, too, and easier to curl, fold, or manipulate in other ways. The oldest message found, according to Lobatcheva et al, had been torn into thin strips and tied in a sailor’s knot before being thrown away.

Writers pressed letters into the bark with a sharp-pointed pen made from bone or iron – no ink was used. More than 200 of these pens from the 10th-15th centuries have been found in Novgorod.

Metal pens from Novgorod (Fuller)

The bark is soft enough that a stylus will leave an indentation without any ink. (Again, thinner strips seem to work better, as the indentations leave a little discoloring in the bark to make the letters easier to see.) I’ve also found that wooden and brass pens work just as well. A lead stylus will leave a gray mark similar to a pencil.

Testing different types of writing material on a thicker piece of bark (from top to bottom): lead, silver, bone.

References

Fuller, Michael J. “Medieval Novgorod: Metal Artifacts.” Medieval Archaeological Remains at Velichy Novgorod. Web page with photos from a museum visit. July 30, 2006. http://users.stlcc.edu/mfuller/NovgorodMetalp.html

Lobatcheva, Irina; Bosworth, Amanda; and Lobatchev, Vlad. Letters One Thousand Years Old. Lexington: Parallel Worlds’ Books, 2014.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Russian birchbark messages: language and literacy

From the 11th to 14th centuries, the people of Novgorod had an unusually literate culture for its time. Men, women, peasants, and even children knew how to read and write, and they used slips of birchbark for business and personal correspondence.

Linguistically, Slavs from different tribes in the 9th-11th centuries could understand each other without much trouble. The Old Novgorod dialect was also spoken in Pskov, Perm, and Northern Belarus. It differed from the central dialect spoken in Kiev, Chernigov, Ryazan, Smolensk, Rostov, and Suzdal. This central dialect was closer to the Church Slavonic that became the standard written language. The difference between dialects increased in the 11th-12th centuries but disappeared by the 17th century, after the Novgorod Republic was annexed by the Grand Principality of Moscow. Modern Russian language has features from both dialects (Zaliznyak, Andrey).

Russians wrote in the Cyrillic alphabet, developed by Cyril of Byzantium and his brother Methodius, who were tasked with creating a Slavic alphabet based on the Greek model.

The Sofia First Chronicle tells us that Yaroslav the Wise traveled to Novgorod in 1030 and gathered 300 children of local priests, then put them into a school where they learned from the local bishop. The first students became the earliest birchbark scribes, likely social elites. It became common practice to teach children how to read and write at age seven. The most “famous” example of this education comes from 17 scraps of birchbark lessons and doodles by a seven-year-old boy named Onfim in the 13th century. His drawings look much like a modern seven-year-old’s.

Onfim’s homework and doodles.

Another doodle by Onfim: father and son as warriors, perhaps?

More of Onfim’s doodles. The one on the left shows his parents, the other may be a type of game played with friends.

Many researchers theorize that wax tablets were used for practice. The Novgorod Psalter, considered “the oldest book in the Slavic world of Russia, Bulgaria, and the Balkan,” was a type of wax tablet. It dates back to 988 to 1010 and consists of three bound wooden tablets with four wax pages containing Psalms 75-76 and a fragment of Psalm 67 in Church Slavonic.

Writing on birchbark required scribes to press harder, and the results were more permanent – but it made for cheap, convenient stationary, since wax tablets were harder to send back and forth. While parchment was expensive and reserved for important and/or sacred documents, birchbark was plentiful and disposable. People used it for drafts of deeds, domestic notes, and private letters.

Townspeople also read books on parchment. Monastic libraries loaned them out. Letter No. 271 from the 14th century asks for the recipient to send the author something to read.

Literacy spread over the centuries. 95 percent of all discovered birchbark letters were non-religious in subject matter. Women were also literate. Many letters were either written by or addressed to female relatives, based on the names, pronouns, and gendered reflexive verbs in the messages.

A few powerful nobles, like Petr Mihalkovich in the mid-12th century, employed scribes to write their letters for them, but researchers take this to mean that even his servants were literate – and not to assume that Petr himself wasn’t. We even have letters written from peasants to other peasants.

References

Birchbark Literacy from Medieval Rus: Contents and Contexts (INTAS-Project Ref. Nr. 03-51-3867). Rukopicniye Pamyatniki Drevney Rusi. http://gramoty.ru/.

Lobatcheva, Irina; Bosworth, Amanda; and Lobatchev, Vlad. Letters One Thousand Years Old. Lexington: Parallel Worlds’ Books, 2014.

Paul Wickenden of Thanet. “The Art of Onfim: Medieval Novgorod Through the Eyes of a Child.” Text with images based on an article for Tournaments Illuminated #116 (Fall 1995). http://www.goldschp.net/SIG/onfim/onfim.html.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Russian birchbark messages: when and where they were used

From the 11th to 14th centuries, the people of Novgorod had an unusually literate culture for its time. Men, women, peasants, and even children knew how to read and write, and they used slips of birchbark for business and personal correspondence.

Photo of a birchbark message, No. 10 Staraya Russa, 1160-1180. (Birchbark Literacy from Medieval Rus: Contents and Contexts)

The first birchbark scroll to be discovered was found in a gap between beams of a wooden walkway, crumpled up and covered in mud. If it weren’t for characters on the surface that managed to shine through the mud, archaeologists likely would have dismissed it as a bobber for fishing tackle. Enough scrolls have been uncovered since then that we have plenty of evidence that they were used widely, and this has given us ample insight into everyday life.

We have a rough idea of when they written based on where they were found in the strata of medieval roads. The wooden beams used for pavement have been dated by comparing their tree rings with dendrochronological scales. Novgorodians repaved their roads roughly every 25 years – adding another layer when the dirt on the old pavement got slippery enough to make horses fall. Birchbark scrolls found between two layers of pavement can be dated between the dates when those layers were paved.

Researchers can also date the writing on scrolls based on linguistic features that are similar to those found in manuscripts from those eras. For example, someone writing a book on parchment in the 11th century would have used the same grammar, syntax, and writing style as someone writing a birchbark memo from the same period, because the two scribes were taught the same way.

Of more than 1,200 birchbark scrolls excavated from medieval Russian cities (Novgorod, Staraya Russa, Smolensk, Pskov, Vitebsk, Torzhok, Moscow, and Tver’), 85% were found in Novgorod and were written in the Old Novgorod dialect.

Map of Kievan Rus (Wikimedia Commons)

Letters were usually discarded after use, either torn into pieces along the text or cut with a knife or scissors and thrown out to protect the recipient’s privacy. These messages survived due to Novgorod’s cold, humid climate and high water table. We have far fewer archaeological records after the second half of the 18th century when Catherine the Great ordered the town’s soils to be drained.

Novgorod fell to Ivan III in 1478. Scholars believe that this was the end of birchbark letters. Ivan III executed or evicted a number of the Novgorod elite and a few severe famines wiped out a lot of other people. Enough people lost their wealth, homes, etc. that the way of life was interrupted – literacy education ended, along with the practice of keeping business notes and sending correspondence. By the time of a 1614 census, the city was practically deserted.

References

Birchbark Literacy from Medieval Rus: Contents and Contexts (INTAS-Project Ref. Nr. 03-51-3867). Rukopicniye Pamyatniki Drevney Rusi. http://gramoty.ru/.

Lobatcheva, Irina; Bosworth, Amanda; and Lobatchev, Vlad. Letters One Thousand Years Old. Lexington: Parallel Worlds’ Books, 2014.

Map of Kievan Rus. Wikimedia Commons, 2010. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kievan_Rus_en.jpg

Zaliznyak, Andrey. The Old Novgorod’s Dialect. 2004. Zaliznyak is a Russian linguist famous for his specialization in this dialect; he describes about 500 linguistic features that could be used to date birchbark letters.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Poet Behind The Song of Igor’s Campaign

We don’t know exactly who wrote The Song of Igor’s Campaign, Russia’s most famous and enduring medieval epic poem from the 12th century. It’s believed that he was someone hired to write a poem commemorating the campaign shortly after it happened (Nabokov). There are significant differences between the events in the poem and the history recorded in The Chronicle (Wikipedia), which would indicate that the poem and the historical record were written by two different people at different times, possibly with access to different pieces of information. The styles of writing are also very different from one another. The Song takes artistic license (and possibly plays loosely with known facts) to create a more interesting, creative work. The poetry itself displays a masterful grasp of rhyme and meter (Nabokov) that has helped it endure over the centuries as the best known work of literature from medieval Russia.

The poet makes several references to another bard named Boyan. Although we don’t have any historical reference to Boyan outside this poem (Nabokov), the Song poet refers to him as a famed “song-maker of the times of old” (831-832), a poet/seer with a magical power for inspiring those who listened to him. The poem uses the word veshchiy – a word that connotes not just the power of inspiration, but also a magical ability. It’s possible that Boyan was a real artist known to the Song poet, but whose own work was never recorded (or has been lost).

Nabokov, Vladimir. The Song of Igor’s Campaign: An Epic of the 12th Century. New York: Ardis Publishers, 1960. Online version: http://lib.ru/NABOKOW/slovo.txt.

“The Tale of Igor’s Campaign.” Wikipedia, 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tale_of_Igor%27s_Campaign.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment